Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
1339
Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
1339
Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
1339
Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
1339
Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
668
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, null given in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
675
Warning: preg_match_all(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
668
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, null given in
/home/amadeus/doms/cselian/2011/inc-htmldom.php on line
675
Series 1, Chapter 22 pg 227, Para 2:
But in what consists this freedom of the Purusha? The Purusha of the current Sankhya philosophy is free in the essence of his being, but because he is the non-doer,
akarta; and in so far as he permits Nature to throw on the inactive Soul her shadow of action, he becomes bound phenomenally by the actions of the gunas and cannot recover his freedom except by dissociation from her and by cessation of her activities. If then a man casts from him the idea of himself as the doer or of the works as his, if, as the Gita enjoins, he fixes himself in the view of himself as the inactive non-doer,
atmanam akartaram, and all action as not his own but Nature's, as the play of her gunas, will not a like result follow? The Sankhya Purusha is the giver of the sanction, but a passive sanction only,
anumati, the work is entirely Nature's; essentially he is the witness and sustainer, not the governing and active consciousness of the universal Godhead. He is the Soul that sees and accepts, as a spectator accepts the representation of a play he is watching, not the Soul that both governs and watches the play planned by himself and staged in his own being. If then he withdraws the sanction, if he refuses to acknowledge the illusion of doing by which the play continues, he ceases also to be the sustainer and the action comes to a stop, since it is only for the pleasure of the witnessing conscious Soul that Nature performs it and only by his support that she can maintain it. Therefore it is evident that the Gita's conception of the relations of the Purusha and Prakriti are not the Sankhya's, since the same movement leads to a quite different result, in one case to cessation of works, in the other to a great, a selfless and desireless, a divine action. In the Sankhya Soul and Nature are two different …
Found 1 matches in 1872 items.